|
1
|
- Paul Peeling
- April 1st, 2005
|
|
2
|
- Goals and features of UROPs
- My UROP experience
- Benefits for University and faculty
- Benefits for students
- Potential obstacles and responses
- A proposal for a pilot scheme
|
|
3
|
- Real research
- Influence careers… a stepping stone to academic research
- Collaboration
- Awareness of subject area
- New, transferrable skills
|
|
4
|
- Summer placements
- Term-time projects
- Academic credit
- Bursary payment – hours/week
- Direct application with research proposal
- Faculty supervision
|
|
5
|
- Start-up company
- Programming applications
- Corporate research and documentation
- Medical technology and devices
|
|
6
|
- Competitive edge for undergraduate admissions
- Term-time availability
- Increased range and variety of projects
- Improved faculty-student atmosphere
- Education, laboratory experience
- … and high quality undergraduate research work!
|
|
7
|
- Early entry into exciting areas of research
- Application of theory
- Encourages and profits from independence and innovation
- Source of income
- Stimulates excitement in subject area
- Career guidance – academic, laboratory
|
|
8
|
- Time
- Faculty supervision time
- Negligable for well-organised, managed projects
- Cambridge ethic of independent study
- Student commitment: the balance between academic and extra-curricular
- UROPs not viewed as academic work
- If opportunities exist, willing students find the time
- Not for all students, yet 80% of MIT undergraduates have taken a UROP
|
|
9
|
- Money and Resources
- Student loan and income concerns
- Limited lab space and training
- UROP application process
- How to go about meeting faculty
- Eight week terms
- A small pilot scheme could help to investigate these issues.
|
|
10
|
- Small number of exceptional, interested second-year students
- Faculty outreach and applications
- Use existing summer projects
- College bursaries from subject funds
- Extensive feedback, coupled with publicity
|